Jack’s Blog Title

Feed Your Head

December 24th, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in Uncategorized · No Comments

The Early Works

Born in 1926, Coltrane grew up in Hamlet and High Point, N.C., moving to Philadelphia after high school; the top of the second-tier jazz towns in the Northeast, it was his home base as he worked through roadhouses across the country, apprenticing with bandleaders like Eddie (Cleanhead) Vinson, Johnny Hodges and Dizzy Gillespie.

When Coltrane made the album “Blue Train” in 1957, for Blue Note, he was 30 and had only one album out under his own name. By that year Sonny Rollins, the saxophonist perceived as his rival, had already made a dozen, and he was four years younger. “Blue Train” was the newly pulled-together Coltrane, after an entanglement with drugs and drinking, and a long period in music spent learning, faltering and near-missing.

“Moment’s Notice,” a piece from “Blue Train” on the Rose Theater program, is an unusual and quickly moving set of chord changes, and soloing through it can challenge improvisers. Double that for “Giant Steps,” which has also made it into the Rose Theater set list.

In “Giant Steps” the chord changes arrive even faster: once every other beat. Coltrane worked obsessively on “Giant Steps” and the whole harmonic theory behind it. But he had his doubts about it, finding it too mechanical, and seldom performed it thereafter. The tune has accrued weight over time as a finger-buster, an étude to prove one’s facility with harmony.

A clip that appeared on YouTube last month shows the song apparently being played by a robot, blowing air through the tenor saxophone, with machine hands fingering the keys. The robot, if it is a robot, sounds pretty good playing it.

At a certain point, about 1961, Coltrane’s name became shorthand for the idea of cultural rarefaction. You might remember Coltrane references in movies like Woody Allen’s “Alice” or Spike Lee’s “Mo’ Better Blues,” or from books like Ken Kesey’s “Sometimes a Great Notion”: they propose Coltrane as a kind of sacred mystery, an unparsable source of enlightenment. But he was a down-home character too, and the raw country sound was always with him.

That’s the unique and spooky thing about Coltrane: his stolidity, and his deep countryness. In photographs, distinct from the hard-shell hipster urbanites around him, his eyes register the same note of guileless concentration that you see in Walker Evans’s pictures of farm families from the 30’s.

The Bluesman

The lovely title track from “Blue Train” was just the beginning of a family of original blues pieces. The album “Coltrane Plays the Blues,” recorded a little more than three years later, has proven weirdly resistant to age. Lesser known within the Atlantic Records period that produced the albums “Giant Steps” and “My Favorite Things,” it is beautiful for its new-old kind of blues, a more droning, largely major-key, easy-tempo, antique-sounding kind than the ambitious bebop blues tunes circulating through jazz of the 1950’s. (“Mr. Knight,” from “Coltrane Plays the Blues,” is scheduled to be part of the Rose Theater concerts.)

“Coltrane Plays the Blues” doesn’t collect all Coltrane’s blues pieces of that period: among others, there’s the Moby-Dick of them all, “Chasin’ the Trane,” from “John Coltrane Live at the Village Vanguard,” recorded in November 1961.

“Chasin’ the Trane,” also on the Rose Theater list, is a blues in F, and a 16-minute spell of off-the-cuff, cropped statements that eventually roll out into long, precise, stirring improvisations. Bach-like in hardness and precision, these lines gobble up the horn, jumping all over it within single phrases.

There are bootleg recordings preceding it that give the general idea — I cherish one from the Sutherland Lounge in Chicago, eight months earlier — but this performance is the first well-known indication of the greatness of Coltrane’s band, with the bassist Jimmy Garrison and the drummer Elvin Jones. (This is not to ignore the pianist McCoy Tyner, but he drops out for “Chasin the Trane,” to make the band a trio.)

The Romantic

In his time Coltrane had no peer as a player of romantic ballads; he learned from Johnny Hodges, the master of that form. For his first wife, he wrote “Naima,” which is on the Rose Theater set list. Perhaps it’s the insistent pedal tone, grounding everything, or the wide intervals, or the rich harmony; but “Naima” almost reinvented this type of tune in jazz, building on Hodges saxophone showcases like Duke Ellington’s “Warm Valley” yet intimating something deeper, a kind of contemplative, I’ll-see-you-in-the-next-world feeling.

Shortly, though, Coltrane moved on and started making a new and different kind of ballad, hymnlike songs with ancient and slightly tragic overtones. And in the tradition of jazz musicians who made sure they knew the lyrics to a song before playing it on the horn — Lester Young, for the best example — he began writing his own texts to base the ballads on, imitating the rhythm of how the words might be spoken.

The culmination of this approach was the “Psalm” portion of “A Love Supreme.” But the Jazz at Lincoln Center Orchestra has chosen instead something equally powerful: “Alabama,” which was recorded in the studio but came out on the LP “Coltrane Live at Birdland.” It was recorded two months after the bombing of a Baptist Church in Birmingham, Ala.; within that time the suspect, a Klansman named Robert Chambliss, was found not guilty and received a small fine and a six-month sentence for possessing the dynamite.

The first part of Coltrane’s “Alabama” sounds as if it were through-written, its phrases a little unnatural; it has been long suspected that it is tied to a written text, though none has been found. At the middle comes an easy-swinging improvised portion, less than a minute long, and then the re-entrance of that strange theme. The music projects a feeling right next to despair, but still intent on moving forward.

If anyone wants to know why there’s such a major fuss still made about John Coltrane, why he is so loved and referred to, the reason is probably inside “Alabama.” The incantational tumult he could raise in a long improvisation, the steel-trap knowledge of harmony, the writing: that’s all very impressive. But “Alabama” is a kind of perfect psychological portrait of a time, a complicated mood that nobody else rendered so well.

“John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman” is another mood record, but one accessible to anyone who listened to pop music on the radio in the 20th century: the kind generated by a deep male voice singing heavy-lidded love songs. It serves as the backbone of the gig at the Allen Room next week, with the baritone singer Kevin Mahogany and the Coltrane-influenced tenor saxophonist Todd Williams, who was part of Mr. Marsalis’s bands in the late 80’s and early 90’s, before leaving to play in the Times Square Church.

It is a supermeditative record, with the drummer Elvin Jones, elsewhere as forceful as a truck, playing barely audibly on songs like “They Say It’s Wonderful,” under Johnny Hartman’s cellolike voice and Coltrane’s broad sound. As with the best Coltrane ballad recordings, these songs conjure something bigger than earthly love. For each listener the record occupies a distinct imaginary space.

At Lincoln Center the trick will be to make the music work in a very real space, a high-rent commercial zone with glasses clinking and tabs mounting. Come armed with a version of it in your own memory, and remember that Coltrane brought a lot of listeners up short 40 years ago. If we do our homework, we might be able to catch up to him now.

 Ben Ratliff, September 8, 2006 NY Times, nytimes.com

 

This article is about a special presentation at the Lincoln center to celbrate the 80th anniverserry of the birth of the late Jazz legend, John Coltrane. John Coltrane is my favorite jazz artist and I find this article to be personally interesting.  

→ No Comments

No Child Left Behind? Thats a laugh. ha. ha. ha.

December 21st, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in Uncategorized · No Comments

George W. Bush’s brilliant No Child Left Behind Act is about as brilliant as a dead light-bulb. It doesn’t even make sense!Schools around the nation take standardized tests to see where they are as far as their education. Schools that do well on the test will receive more funding, schools that do poorly will not receive funding.

First of all, standerized tests suck. I hate them. They take time away from the classes because teachers are forced to teach towards the tests instead of towards the subject content of the course. With the prospect of additional government funding behind good results on the tests, Administrators have even more reason to make teachers concentrate on the test, causing the rest of the education on the actual course fall by the leeway.

Secondly, it doesn’t even make sense. If the school gets lower test scores wouldn’t it make sense to give them more funding so that they have better programs to give better educations? The No Child Left Behind Act only makes the gap between strong schools and weak schools larger. Poor schools will only get worse, and good schools will be taking money that should be going to the weaker schools to assist them.

As noted comedian Jerry Seinfeld would say, “Whats up with that?”

When asked if Teacher Mr. Olmstead liked the NO Child Left Behind Act he responded,

No.

The No Child Left Behind Act is disliked by teachers, parents, and students alike. It is ineffective and backwards. Lets get some positive change in the education plans here!

test

→ No Comments

Its the prize fight of the century! Bush vs. Reagan! Reagan takes a fall in the 4th!

December 21st, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in Bush vs. Reagan! · Uncategorized · 5 Comments

Economic policies vary from administration to administration. For example, in the FDR administration, after the Great Depression, FDR took on a new economic policy. He created government organizations to directly assist the poorer classes during the depression. His groups directly funded jobs for the lower classes and directly helped the lower classes. I believe that FDR’s fine, fine economic policy worked very well and was very honorable.

As opposed to Mr. Bush and Mr. Reagan.

bill or shirt?

So according to Mr. Bush and Mr. Reagan, tax cuts in the upper classes will result in more money in the economy. However, with this “trickle down theory” there is no guarantee that the money will be spent in such a way that it will eventually end up in the lower classes and put to the best effect. With taxes and government regulation, we can be sure that money in taxes will go to assistance for the lower classes, or at least hope. However, politicians sometimes skim money off of taxes or people cheat on their income taxes. People only look at the bad side of taxes and think that their money is slipping away into nothing. But in reality, most of the money actually ends up where it is meant to end up. With government regulation and direct assistance to the lower classes, places of living can be improved with the government’s help as opposed to relying on the trickle down theory, where, if the money even gets to the lower classes, there is no guarantee that it will be spent fixing the living conditions of the poorer classes.

→ 5 Comments

Staying the course no more!

December 21st, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in Uncategorized · No Comments

The controversial Baker Report was created by the Iraq Study group and announced the need to greatly re-adress the issues in Iraq. President Bush had ppreviously said that the best thing to do in Iraq is simply “stay the Course,” but now that hes gotten through his head that that won’t quite cut it, he has relized that a change needs to be made.

The Baker Report addresses the porblem of what to do with the troop number in Iraq. Republican officals have been reccomending an increase of troop numbers, an action very simialr to that of Vietnam. However, the study group showed that that was not a viable option. The study group reccomernded that the troops be gradually withdrawn from Iraq, again, similar to the US withdrawl from Vietnam. The United States has dug itself into a deep hole and taken all of Iraq with it. Now we have to find some way to dig a way out, and the study group hopes to bring to light the possible options.

THe study group has announced that it doesnt plan to suddenly have the golden ticket for a way out of Iraq. Instead, it presents different views and different options for getting out of the mess of Iraq. They list many different options and different steps that must be taken to make these options effective.

RECOMMENDATION 2: The goals of the diplomatic offensive as it relates to regional players should be to:

i. Support the unity and territorial integrity of Iraq.
ii. Stop destabilizing interventions and actions by Iraq’s neighbors.
iii. Secure Iraq’s borders, including the use of joint patrols with neighboring countries.
iv. Prevent the expansion of the instability and conflict beyond Iraq’s borders.
v. Promote economic assistance, commerce, trade, political support, and, if possible, military assistance for the Iraqi government from non-neighboring Muslim nations.
vi. Energize countries to support national political reconciliation in Iraq.
vii. Validate Iraq’s legitimacy by resuming diplomatic relations, where appropriate, and reestablishing embassies in Baghdad.
viii. Assist Iraq in establishing active working embassies in key capitals in the region (for example, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).
ix. Help Iraq reach a mutually acceptable agreement on Kirkuk.
x. Assist the Iraqi government in achieving certain security, political, and economic milestones, including better performance on issues such as national reconciliation, equitable distribution of oil revenues, and the dismantling of militias.

 There have been many different and varied reactions to the Baker report. According to the Wikipedia entry, Rush Limbaugh reacted by saying that he “wanted to puke” while listening to the panelists. Of course, that could just be him over dosing on whatever pills he’s into at this point. Other people against the report have attacked it for being defeates and negative. However, the situation that we are curerently in is not all sunshine and lollipops. In order to save the lives of US soldiers, we may very well have some way to evacuate from Iraq.

Thanks for nothing President.

→ No Comments

GLOBAL WARMING ATRRGGGGHHHHH

December 15th, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in reality · 1 Comment

cover of time

Glacier National Park used to be full of beautiful glaciers and snow was all about. However, a trip top the park today will reveal mud, mist, occasional rain, and very few glaciers. The nationally known glaciers have started to melt and will soon be gone. The snows of Mt. Kiliamanjaro have dissapeared and the poalr ice caps are slowly fading away. Just look at that picture on the cover of Time.

Carbon levels are rising in the environment and trap heat within the environemnt. Are humans to blame? Maybe we aren’t the leading contibuter of Carbon gas to the environment. But hey, better safe than sorry. Suppose I’m over reacting and there is no global warming. But suppose I, and the rest of the leading scientists around the world, are right. A little help can go a long way.

Worldwide temperatures have climbed more than 1[degree]F over the past century, and the 1990s were the hottest decade on record. After analyzing data going back at least two decades on everything from air and ocean temperatures to the spread and retreat of wildlife, the IPCC asserts that this slow but steady warming has had an impact on no fewer than 420 physical processes and animal and plant species on all continents.

This quote is from this time article. Ice caps everywhere are melting into nothingness and soon half of the remaining land on the earth will be covered with water. The enormous amount of people that are displaced will cost the world’s economy in the billions to help accomadate them.

So, in the end, I might be wrong about this whole thing. But then again, maybe I’m not. Better safe than sorry!

→ 1 Comment

Iraq: Vietnam, today

November 27th, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in Vietnam · 1 Comment

socialist party

THere are many parrallels that can be drawn between the current war in Iraq with the war in Vietnam. In both cases the United States went into a foreign land to fight a battle that did not directly affect its people. At the start of both the Vietnam war and the Iraq war, the general consensus within the United States was support for the war. However, over time, as the number of troops needed to get the job done increased and more troops were sent overseas the support of the war within the United States started to fade. The number of troops in Vietnam considered to be neccessary to end the war continued to grow over the years, and now, John McCain and memebers of George W. Bush’s cabinet are calling for an increase in troop number to end the conflict in Iraq.

In Vietnam, the United States troops were fighting against an enemy that took advantage of their knowledge of the land to employ geurilla tactics and confuse the US troops. It was hard for troops to tell the difference between enimeies and friends and were often confused in who they fought. In Iraqi, this issue of confusion with the enemy is very similar. It is unclear who the enemy is and it is often hard to tell where they are coming from.

Previously the large difference between Iraq and Vietnam was the Tet offensive. While in Vietnam the Tet offensive marked a large turning point in the war as it showed that the North Vietnamese were not ready to give up to the United States and were willing to fight on untill the last man. As far as for the public at home, they realized that the government’s reports of an end in sight for the war were not strictly true and that it would be some time until the war ended. In Iraq, there was no large marked event like the Tet offensive, instead, response to the American troops has been gradually rising to reach a paramount equal to that of the Tet offensive.

That was, before the Thanksgiving day massacre this year in Iraq. As an article from the British newsource, The Independent, talks about the Thanksgiving Day massacre. As the article says,

The atrocity might have been timed to expose how the US - its military power and moral authority sapped by the war - has lost most of whatever influence it had to shape events in the Middle East.

This terrorist attack against the innocent citizens in Iraq marks another similarity between the two wars. In both cases the citizens of Vietnam and Iraq suffered from the wars around them. Oh the terror. Oh the horror. Oh the inhumanity. Oh the cruelity.

 At least the Dali Lama knows where its at.

→ 1 Comment

The GI Bill

October 12th, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in GI Bill · No Comments

As Andrew says in his fine blog:

Many Blacks and women who should have benefitted from the GI Bill were dishonorably discharged or just forgotten. Employment services as well and the Federal Housing Administration would often defer blacks and only offer the worst jobs and homes to them. Those that did actually get into college were forced to go into black colleges which were very overcrowded.

The GI bill of yesteryear after the end of WWII was know for its substantial aid given to veterns. It allowed many people to get a college level education that could not initially afford it. However, the darker side of the GI Bill was its strong racist aspects. Blacks were given less education funds that would only count towards a second rate crowded black college. Now adays the bill is less race discrimintory and it gives $1,075 for every month in the service that is full-time.

However, this monetray incentive that has been present for decades seems to be aimed at middle and lower classes that need the money to live, forcing them to fight and die for a country that isnt all that interested in their wellfare unless they put their lives on the line. How can this be done, you ask?

Well the answer is simple. It’s America. The Government can get away with anything it damn well pleases.

Comments Off

American Popular Culture Part 3

October 12th, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in Uncategorized · No Comments

Well, here we are with the last American Popular Culture blog. Its the big day that we’ve all been waiting for. In class we have been discussing the policies of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. versus those of Malcolm X. Their ideas of integration and black nationalism, respectfully, are contrasting ideas. These contrasting ideas are both reflected in their own way on the telly and in other forms of popular culture.

The television channel BET (Black Entertainment Television) seems to buy more into Malcolm X’s idea of Black nationalism as seenby the title. However, it can also be seen as furthur segregating the fine programing on television by giving the black demographic its own and keeping it seperate from the rest.

However, on other shows on other channels the rate of integration seems to be growing from that of the shows in the 90’s discussed in part 2. (There are pictures of them) Shows today seem to have a more integrated cast. Although Martin Luther King Jr.’s initial dream probably didnt have the goal of integrating “Next” on MTV on a 3:30 in the fall show season of 2004, it certainly is a step towards the right direction. As James McKean says,

Do something in popular culture and the rest of society will follow.

Grey's AnatomyWhose Line

If we can manage to integrate popular culture as it gradually is, we shall soon be able to live in a world that is completely integrated and minorities in higher wealth brackets will become less and less of rare sighting and become more and more of a way of live. Soon enough, people will start to look past skin color and actually see the person for who they are.

Look to the West, the first future is already starting.

Comments Off

American Popular Culture Part 2

October 10th, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in American Popular Culture · No Comments

Today we look at our popular culture and our tv shows and marvel at the integration of race among the charcters, feeling as though we have come a long way from the segregated shows of the 1950’s. However, many shows were still very racist in the 90’s. If one were to view the casts of such popular shows as “Seinfeld” or “The Fresh Prince of Bel Air”, while showing each races equally, the shows themselves were segregated as the cast of “fresh Prince” is almost excusilvly Black while the cast of Seinfeld is almost exclusively white. So, we may feel as though we made great advances in culture in the past decades, but in truth the real changes didn’t come until the late 90’s and early 00’s.

seinfeld fresh prinze
However, racisism and segregation in pop culture is not unique to the television industry. In music, popular or famous music groups that are famous are few and far between. The Rolling Stones, while holding origins in the 60’s, is made up of all whites. Modern bands today such as Audioslave and The Polyphonic Spree are all lacking in regards to diversity between whites and blacks.

However, some moves have been made forward. Bands of the 60’s and 70’s started to be more integrated, most notabley Sly and the Family Stone. As their official website will testify:

Sly and the Family Stone are credited as one of the first racially integrated bands in music history, belting their message of peace, love and social consciousness through a string of hit anthems that fused R&B, soul, funk and rock n roll. On ‘Different Strokes by Different Folks’ a stylistically, culturally and racially disparate group of chart-toppers mirrors that idealistic diversity. Understand this: There was no precedent for Sly & the Family Stone. 

So, while shows are becoming more diverse, there are still many bridges that need to be crossed and gaps that need to be filled.

Comments Off

Peace Love and Understanding

October 4th, 2006 by jackismyfirstname in Peace · No Comments

John Lennon

Way back when during Nixon’s administration and the Vietnam war, peace was the word around town. However, the ideas of pacivism vs. the ideas activism was strong bone of contention between two sides. Some people felt that the only way to get peace and equality in the United States was through violent actions and powerful activism, as promoted by Malcolm X and Bobby Seale. Seale was one of the co-founders of the Black Panthers and felt strongly that uprisings were needed in order to have equality.

However, on the other side of the spectrum were the pacifists. People like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Ghandi felt that the way to reformation would be completed with peace. They both felt that through peace, people would unite and feelings of racisim and inequalities would disapear. John Lennon and Yoko Ono worked strongly for this idea of pacifisim. They felt that peace could easily be attained along as everyone supported it. As he says in his famous song:

Ev’rybody’s talking about
Bagism, Shagism, Dragism, Madism, Ragism, Tagism
This-ism, that-ism
Isn’t it the most
All we are saying is give peace a chance
All we are saying is give peace a chance

The rest of this song can be found here. John and Yoko promoted peace through posters, billboards, rallys, and peacefull demonstrations. As their billboards proclaimed, War is over if we want it. Peace is in our mind and it is our job to spread it to the world.

War is over

Comments Off